If you look at a direct injected gasoline piston, it has the swirl enhancing ramps in it to continue what the injection can't quite do prior to combustion.
Cad heads have a swirl built into the port already, like many others.
Sometimes a flat piston continues swirl enhancement with the piston headed up top as well as other shapes.
4 valve heads have more tumble and shear off the short turn that continue it's direction the same way.
Sbc TBI swirl port as the precursor to BBC vortec heads show huge potential, seen previously in some experimental years of Nascar and reportedly...incorporated into Honda combustion design strategies.
There's available tests and research info from MIT and other sources in college textbooks focusing the continued education towards emissions in engine design. Much effort published from the 80's as fuel injection progressed.
Because of confidentiality agreements, it's doubtful that you'll find much directly from the OEM's, but in my opinion what you can do is fairly limited anyways, and if you put the engine outside it's original rpm range for that characteristic's intended effect...you negate what you are doing by finding a point of diminishing returns having a negative effect somewhere else or missing the effect altogether.
Tests can show the over-acceleration of the swirl effect to toss fuel right back out of suspension, or the odd protrusion or casting feature (wall) contributing to the weirdness.
Fancy way of stating that if you change much from stock, you have to re-think that part.
Cad heads have a swirl built into the port already, like many others.
Sometimes a flat piston continues swirl enhancement with the piston headed up top as well as other shapes.
4 valve heads have more tumble and shear off the short turn that continue it's direction the same way.
Sbc TBI swirl port as the precursor to BBC vortec heads show huge potential, seen previously in some experimental years of Nascar and reportedly...incorporated into Honda combustion design strategies.
There's available tests and research info from MIT and other sources in college textbooks focusing the continued education towards emissions in engine design. Much effort published from the 80's as fuel injection progressed.
Because of confidentiality agreements, it's doubtful that you'll find much directly from the OEM's, but in my opinion what you can do is fairly limited anyways, and if you put the engine outside it's original rpm range for that characteristic's intended effect...you negate what you are doing by finding a point of diminishing returns having a negative effect somewhere else or missing the effect altogether.
Tests can show the over-acceleration of the swirl effect to toss fuel right back out of suspension, or the odd protrusion or casting feature (wall) contributing to the weirdness.
Fancy way of stating that if you change much from stock, you have to re-think that part.