The real deal Bullitt Mustang going up for auction!

Caddylackn

Active Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
102
Reaction score
41
Points
28
I got mixed feelings on this one.
1. It is cool as f.
2. Do you leave it as is?
3. Do you restore it back to the condition it was in, during filming the movie?

It was a daily driver for years after it was a movie car and has definitely degraded since filming. The article says that Steve McQueen bugged the owner for years to sell it to him, and finally gave up. The owner died with never doing a f.n thing to the car after holding on to it for over 40 years and letting it deteriorate to the point it was undrivable. Kind of a waste.
 

Darius

Well-Known Member
Joined
Oct 15, 2004
Messages
4,296
Reaction score
744
Points
113
Based on the fact that it was driven and not cared for over a period of 40 years I say restore it back to it's condition during filming.
Why leave it in the dilapidated condition brought about by the previous owner?

YMMV

bro. d
 

Caddylackn

Active Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
102
Reaction score
41
Points
28
Here is another interesting story on another iconic piece of movie history, where someone took an abandoned neglected vehicle left wrecked in a field, supposedly with the owners permission.

https://www.hagerty.com/articles-videos/articles/2019/03/29/wild-cherry-van-owner-sounds-off

I can see both sides to this one. He clearly should have looked for the owner before taking it and got something in writing as a Bill of Sale before taking it off the property, he claims he had permission. He may have got permission from the son, who had the same name as the owner. The whole thing smells fishy on both sides.

The owner clearly never had any intention of doing anything with this hulk either, and was not interested in the van at all until it was restored and worth something. Also, leaving a title in a vehicle and leaving it in a field for 30 years, is the same as abandoning it, in my book.

The lawyers get rich, and the van ends up worse than it was before when it was wrecked sitting in the field. Such a shame............

The only thing that makes this van valuable is the paperwork that proves it was the original to the movie, and the guy that took the van and restored it didn't have that paper trail. If he wasn't going to get the paperwork, why he started with that hulk, I don't know, he should have just bought one from a junkyard. He took his risk dumping money into it. It is pretty obvious to me, he was the one that stripped it.
 

Monzallac 425

Active Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2008
Messages
880
Reaction score
60
Points
28
Location
Salinas, Puerto Rico
I also heard a couple of years back the film camera car was found in Mexico and is being restored.

I found the link, it was was in sad shape....


Doug in P.R.:cool:
 

Caddylackn

Active Member
Joined
Sep 7, 2015
Messages
102
Reaction score
41
Points
28
I don't see how this possibly could be an investment or worth even close to $3.74 mil.

You can't drive the car, you can't restore it. Anything you do to it will probably devalue it.

All you can do is show it or rent it to a museum. It would be interesting to see at a Car Museum, but I wouldn't drive there just to see it or pay any extra price just to see it.
 

5one9

Active Member
Joined
Sep 23, 2018
Messages
346
Reaction score
109
Points
43
Location
WV
What vehicle(s) do you drive?
2007 Magnum SRT8, 1957 F100
Ridiculous. Period.
 
Top