The real deal Bullitt Mustang going up for auction!

Discussion in 'Off Topic, B.S., Lounge' started by Monzallac 425, Oct 2, 2019.

  1. Monzallac 425

    Monzallac 425 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    838
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Salinas, Puerto Rico
  2. Caddylackn

    Caddylackn Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    17
    I got mixed feelings on this one.
    1. It is cool as f.
    2. Do you leave it as is?
    3. Do you restore it back to the condition it was in, during filming the movie?

    It was a daily driver for years after it was a movie car and has definitely degraded since filming. The article says that Steve McQueen bugged the owner for years to sell it to him, and finally gave up. The owner died with never doing a f.n thing to the car after holding on to it for over 40 years and letting it deteriorate to the point it was undrivable. Kind of a waste.
     
  3. Darius

    Darius Well-Known Member SUPPORTING MEMBER

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2004
    Messages:
    4,129
    Likes Received:
    658
    Based on the fact that it was driven and not cared for over a period of 40 years I say restore it back to it's condition during filming.
    Why leave it in the dilapidated condition brought about by the previous owner?

    YMMV

    bro. d
     
  4. Caddylackn

    Caddylackn Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2015
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    17
    Here is another interesting story on another iconic piece of movie history, where someone took an abandoned neglected vehicle left wrecked in a field, supposedly with the owners permission.

    https://www.hagerty.com/articles-videos/articles/2019/03/29/wild-cherry-van-owner-sounds-off

    I can see both sides to this one. He clearly should have looked for the owner before taking it and got something in writing as a Bill of Sale before taking it off the property, he claims he had permission. He may have got permission from the son, who had the same name as the owner. The whole thing smells fishy on both sides.

    The owner clearly never had any intention of doing anything with this hulk either, and was not interested in the van at all until it was restored and worth something. Also, leaving a title in a vehicle and leaving it in a field for 30 years, is the same as abandoning it, in my book.

    The lawyers get rich, and the van ends up worse than it was before when it was wrecked sitting in the field. Such a shame............

    The only thing that makes this van valuable is the paperwork that proves it was the original to the movie, and the guy that took the van and restored it didn't have that paper trail. If he wasn't going to get the paperwork, why he started with that hulk, I don't know, he should have just bought one from a junkyard. He took his risk dumping money into it. It is pretty obvious to me, he was the one that stripped it.
     
  5. Monzallac 425

    Monzallac 425 Active Member

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2008
    Messages:
    838
    Likes Received:
    48
    Location:
    Salinas, Puerto Rico
    I also heard a couple of years back the film camera car was found in Mexico and is being restored.

    I found the link, it was was in sad shape....



    Doug in P.R.:cool:
     

Share This Page